Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

This question was asked on a forum I frequent. I figured the answer might be of general interest.*

A developmental edit concentrates on major structural elements like plot and characterization. Basically, it's looking at the story as a whole and not worrying so much about presentation at the sentence and paragraph level.

A good critique group can provide this service as well, but feedback from an editor is often useful for three reasons:

1) The editor may hilight issues that polite critiquers would be unwilling to address. Critiquers are often hesitant to suggest major changes like combining two characters or shifting scenes around; it feels too much like rewriting the author's story.

2) If the editor's any good, then he/she will have more experience than the average critiquer, and (presumably) be better able to home in on core problems rather than obsessing about surface details.

3) The editor gets paid. This means that he or she will spend several days thinking about the book, reading back through key sections, and drafting a well-thought-out summary of strengths and weaknesses. You're unlikely to get equal service from a free critique exchange unless you're doing it with your mother or your best friend.

My advice regarding professional editing vs. critique groups? Definitely start with a critique group. When you've gained experience knowing which feedback to use and which to ignore, and when you're starting to feel that your career's reached a tipping point: that's the time to consider hiring an editor.

*Please note that I am not currently seeking new editing clients. However, there are handy lists of on Codex and Kindleboards for those who are interested in finding someone.


( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
Mar. 1st, 2012 02:25 pm (UTC)
And now, speaking from the writer end of a developmental edit: Nancy is harsh, thorough, critical, detailed and the best critique/editor I've ever had. In short, exactly what a book needs. I gave her Under Witch Aura when I thought it was PERFECT. I never give my beta readers anything less. I thought, "Ha! She'll never find a thing wrong."

She tore it into little bitty pieces and critiqued each part (completely professionally and clinically, of course.) She worked with me on a couple of things that I didn't understand and we discussed a couple of areas where I disagreed (she was right though. On the two areas I didn't take her word for it and only made small changes, the very next beta reader beat on the same issues.)

It's important to have more than one reader (at least for me.) Nancy hit the highlights and the lowlights, narrowing in on problems. Once I fixed those, it was important to see IF I fixed them and how well.

I value Nancy's input because she doesn't let anything slide. My beta readers aren't under a timeline when they promise to get it done. Nancy is. My beta readers aren't at all responsible for catching things that don't make sense, that are just bad habits or bad plotting. Nancy has a fine eye for that sort of thing. She has a lot of talent and reading experience. She's kind, thoughtful and THOROUGH.

Under Witch Aura was hugely improved by her input.

I think it's important to have a few people look at it--and don't be afraid to have some that are thorough and some that are cheerleaders. I have a couple of beta readers who aren't picky. They read for the emotional impact of the story and don't care so much about plot. These are just as important, but there's nothing like a good developmental edit from someone who is experienced and good at it.
Mar. 3rd, 2012 10:09 am (UTC)
Aw, thanks Maria. I'm glad my feedback was helpful!

And you make a good point about the timeline. It's hard to hold volunteer readers to a schedule. :)
(no subject) - pingback_bot - Mar. 1st, 2012 11:05 pm (UTC) - Expand
Mar. 2nd, 2012 07:27 am (UTC)

I too have used Nancy's editoral service and, as a total novice, she gave me a great deal to think about!

Writing is something we all may do.

Writing well is something that we must learn to do.

To learn, one must have a qualified teacher.

Thank you Nancy, for your excellent help. :o)

Edited at 2012-03-02 07:27 am (UTC)
Mar. 3rd, 2012 10:10 am (UTC)
You're very welcome. And thank you for being an excellent student. :)
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )




Web Site | Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn | Google+

The Death and
Rebirth of
Anne Bonny

and other stories

amazon | kobo | barnes & noble | iTunes | Audible

a novelette

amazon | kobo | barnes & noble | iTunes | Audible

That Undiscovered Country
Jim Baen Memorial
Award Winner

paperback | kindle | nook | PDF | Other

2011 Nebula Nominee

Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, March 2011

paperback | kindle | nook | smashwords

The Breath of Heaven
Stories from Distant Worlds

paperback | kindle | nook | smashwords

In the Halls of the Sky-Palace
Jim Baen's Universe, June 2009

kindle | nook | smashwords

Backlash (novelette)
Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine, 2010

kindle | nook | smashwords

The Man Who
Murdered Himself

Phobos Award Winner

kindle | nook | smashwords

Dead Men Don't Cry:
11 Stories by Nancy Fulda

Paperback | kindle | nook | smashwords | DRM-free

Nothing This Fun Could be Good for You (article)
Available at:
Clarkesworld Magazine

Like Rain From Silver Skies
Available at:
Basement Stories

Knowing Neither Kin Nor Foe
Available at:
Beneath Ceaseless Skies

Nancy Fulda is a 2012 Hugo and Nebula Nominee, a Phobos Award winner and a Vera Hinckley Mayhew Award recipient. She is the first (and so far only) female recipient of the Jim Baen Memorial Award. Her fiction has appeared in a number of professional venues.

Nancy Fulda is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com


January 2017
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow